Injera
  • Injera Overview
  • Tokenomics & Vesting Schedule
  • 📚Guides
    • Learn to Mint USDi
    • How to Redeem USDi
    • How to Stake USDi
    • How to Refer
  • đź’ˇSolutions Overview
    • USDi Overview
      • Delta-Neutral Stability
      • Delta-Neutral Examples
      • Scalability
      • Maintaining Delta-Neutral Stability
    • Yield Explanation
      • Yield Mechanism Explanation
    • Underlying Derivatives
      • Futures vs Perpetuals
      • Inverse vs Linear Contracts
      • Basis Spread
    • Peg Arbitrage Mechanism
    • Portfolio Scenario Analysis
  • đź”’Collateral Custody & Security
    • Overview
      • Off-Exchange Settlement in detail
    • Flow Of Funds
  • 🏦Injera Money Market
    • Collateralized Debt Positions
    • Supplying & Borrowing
    • Interest Rates
    • Risk Parameters
    • Liquidations
    • Fees
    • Oracles
  • đź“”Resources
    • Contract addresses
  • Injera Website
  • Injera Money Market
  • Injera Twitter
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Inverse vs Linear Contracts
  • Convexity Implications
  • Example
  1. Solutions Overview
  2. Underlying Derivatives

Inverse vs Linear Contracts

Inverse vs Linear Contracts

A linear payout is the simplest to describe and is used for many swaps. The price of a linear contract is expressed as the price of the underlying against the base currency. ETHUSDT is a linear perpetual and is quoted in Tether, with margin and PNL calculations denominated in Tether.

An inverse contract is worth a fixed amount of the quote currency. In the case of the ETHUSD perpetual, each contract is worth $1 of Ethereum at any price. ETHUSD is an inverse contract because it is quoted as ETH/USD but the underlying is USD/ETH or 1 / (ETH/USD). It is quoted as an inverse to facilitate hedging US Dollar amounts while the spot market convention is to quote the number of US Dollars per Ethereum.

Convexity Implications

Convexity (also known as Gamma) refers to the second derivative of a contract's value with respect to price, and in the case of inverse perpetual futures, it can differ from the relationship suggested by a linear move in price.

While the payoff for a linear contract is just the Contract Multiplier*(Entry Price-Exit Price), the payoff for an inverse contract is Contract Multiplier*(1/Entry Price - 1/Exit Price), introducing convexity.

Example

A trader goes long 50,000 contracts of ETHUSD at a price of 10,000. A few days later the price of the contract increases to 11,000.

The trader’s profit will be: 50,000 * 1 * (1/10,000 - 1/11,000) = 0.4545 ETH

If the price had in fact dropped to 9,000, the trader’s loss would have been: 50,000 * 1 * (1/10,000 - 1/9,000) = -0.5556 ETH. The loss is greater because of the inverse and non-linear nature of the contract. Conversely, if the trader was short then the trader’s profit would be greater if the price moved down than the loss if it moved up.

PreviousFutures vs PerpetualsNextBasis Spread

Last updated 1 year ago

đź’ˇ